Simpleton

Simpleton

If you are one of these people that do not like harsh reality please do not read any further. The following is a relay of information accumulated over the course of nine years.

I want to start by saying that I have never advertised myself as a “nice guy” nor do I care what anyone’s opinion of me is. In general, I try to operate as a decent human being (in general) and try to treat people how I’d like to be treated. Obviously this is the internet, and the internet definitely brings out the worst of us, collectively so everything is taken with a grain of salt.

The irony of the internet and FinTwit/StockTwits in general that it is a collection of opinions on finance and stocks and the requisite for becoming an “authority” on these topics is nothing like the requirements for becoming an authority on these subjects in the real world. What I mean by that is that the “rags to riches” story sells online whereas in the real world of finance where you went to school, what you got your degree in, and what your performance is like matters more. Coincidentally, in both worlds “who’s in your social circle” matters. If you are “friendly” with the folks at the top in either world, you will be billed as an “authority” by proxy.

I wanted to start there because I have always operated online as “this is just text on a screen.” That’s not to say that real conversations and real dialogue cannot be exchanged. But, for the most part, this is just text on a screen and I take nothing away from it. I also understand that some people’s opinions “hold weight” so it is important to me to make sure that I address these things on the front end so that the back end doesn’t break.

That said, the internet is fucking weird. Especially our own little corner of it; financial twitter.

For the last several years — pretty much as long as I can remember doing this — I’ve been associated with @1simpletrader. On many occasion, there has been speculation that he and I are the same person. Funny as that may be to some, what is funnier is the fact that could not be further than the truth. I’ve never met nor plan on ever meeting him. That said, I did treat this person as I would a friend for the last nine years of “knowing” him and hope that this finds him as a wake up call that he desperately needs.

I first interacted with 1ST when he was going by a different username (@letstradestocks99 I believe) in a chatroom I found on StockTwits before I had an account there. I don’t remember how I discovered the link and why I went there but I did and he and I developed a casual acquaintance online.

The moderator of that chat would silo us in a separate room and have us “pitch him” our morning ideas that he would then filter off to the herd. At first, we both thought we were “moving up” in some proverbial non-existent ranks. This came to a head though when the individual started charging “rent” to people in the room. Us included.

Reluctant to pay anyone money for work I was doing for them I left. I joined StockTwits account and started to share my ideas there. I started to tag him in my charts because Trading View requires you to post in two boxes and thus a “friendship” blossomed.

I don’t really know where to start so I will start in the middle and hop around. Objectively, 1ST’s “persona” is everything I hate and love about the internet. Especially fin-twit. Millennial doesn’t even begin to cover it.

After sticking his neck out 16 months ago and getting obliterated online 1ST’s fragile ego was hurt beyond the point where his “big muscles” can repair, bro. This instance took place shortly after he and his online “girlfriend” (who may or may not really be a girl given he never knew what she looked like) broke things off with him.

I know a lot of you who are reading this far are thinking some form of “What the fuck are you talking about? Don’t be a dick.”

Well, 1ST developed an online “relationship” with some “girl” named Cami that lasted three months and resulted in him getting his feelz hurt. The significance of this point is important so hang with me.

To prove a point to her” (and more importantly his own fragile “masculine” ego shrouded in muscles) he stuck his head out there publicly and made some “bold call” that didn’t pan out and resulted in the internet flaming him a couple of days later. Rather than deal with it (or ignore it) and move on, he bailed on Twitter and StockTwits all together for about a year and a half and hung out in my chatroom.

Hey man, look, I’m not one to sit here and tell you I’ve never had my feelings hurt by a woman. But at least I knew what she looked like. Without going too far into explicit details, buddy, who is THIRTY FUCKING YEARS OLD had his feelings hurt by a “girl” that he never met nor Facetimed during a three month stretch one time and kept doubling down on the “relationship” despite dozens of red flags and messages from multiple people in the chat that it was a bad idea. Also, I want to emphasize, the previous was not a typo, he did not know what she looked like.

After this heartbreak, he was compelled to “prove to her what she lost out on” by “being bold” online and that resulted in his ego getting battered some more and subsequently he just bailed on public Twitter and StockTwits.

The point of sharing all of this is not that he was wrong, but rather, once wrong not only did he bail on social media, but also deleted the posts where it was quite obvious he was a jackass. (you can see for yourself on his blog where the only post he’s kept up was the one that shows he “nailed the bottom!” of the 2018 crash: https://1simpletrader.home.blog/)

I want to emphasize all of this to you so as to lift the veil behind who “he really is” both as a trader and as a person. I also want to bring to light his “trading behavior” and some of the annoying behaviors that exist in general on financial twitter.

Financial Twitter is notoriously ripe with uneducated losers who try to tell you “a little hard work and elbow grease and you too can do it!” I am going to parse out the next statement and make it it’s own so that you understand how important it is.

As I’ve stated, and continue to repeat, 90%+ will never make it as a trader and this is not a “work harder” business. There is no direct correlation between input of “hard work” and output of financial profit.



Hopefully the above statement resonates with some of you. This isn’t me acting like I “know more than you” or that I am some “guru” or anything like that for that matter. These are just the facts. The only input to output correlation that exists in the market is the one that exists once you have developed a strategy that works for you. For example, spending more time scanning charts or looking at historical valuations to get an idea of what you want to look for is one way extra input (hours) can benefit you. This is vastly different than the idea that “you can understand and learn how to trade stocks just by trying harder!”

The reality is the market, outside of maybe poker(?), is the only business that I can think of where from day one both novices and professionals are on the same playing field.

Let’s use the following example; Imagine you want to go play pickup basketball and there was only one court to play at in your hometown. At that court the only way to play is to play in pickup basketball game. Each game is comprised of a mixture of players that have never touched a basketball in their lives and guys who are elite level professionals like Lebron James and Kevin Durant. In this scenario the moment you step foot on the court you realize the daunting challenge and disadvantage that you face.

If you were to take that example and apply it to the stock market you realize just how disadvantaged you are as a trader and why it is that I made the statement in the first place.

Meet Reality

What I’m about to say will probably shock many of you who follow 1ST religiously and don’t know his story. I find that it is important and shows you just how insane all of this is.

I’ve never interacted with anyone, in real life or online, that has read more books on the stock market than @1simpletrader. I also think he is one of the best people who draw lines. What I mean by the second statement is that he has learned how to use the Trading View tool better than most. He knows a lot of the tricks on that platform and draws “really pretty clean lines.” I want to make clear however the important distinction between “drawing lines” and being a market technician or formulating proper opinions behind those lines based on data analysis. The distinction here is anyone can learn to draw lines. Lines without context and data interpretation are just that, lines.

Nothing is more evidenced by the statement I made than the following;

I’ve been interacting with @1simpletrader in one form or another for the last nine years. I do not know of ONE SINGLE profitable quarter that he’s had during that entire run.

The longest bull market in history and he could not string together three solid months where he was profitable. To exacerbate this, I also do not know of a SINGLE profitable month he’s had during that same period.

I am emphasizing this because I’ve dealt with a number of traders that were able to turn their trading around in a matter of weeks. I also say this because both quietly, and vocally, he continues to play “above the fold” and “call out furus.”

@1SimpleTrader does all of this while being a 31 year old man who is literally living in his parents basement and working at a grocery store with his mom as a manager at that store.

Take all that in for a moment.

“Muscle man” has never been able to turn a profitable month in a nine year bull market, talks down to people who are doing better at life than he is, is constantly misogynistic despite never having a real girlfriend in 9+ years, is so fucking broke he lives in his parents basement at the ripe age of 31, has no mathematical acumen, has never been educated beyond one semester of junior college, always has an excuse for why shit doesn’t work, makes memes nonstop as the “funny guy” yet gets offended and storms off when confronted about the reality of his situation, and echoes what he’s “right about” while working for mom at a grocery store full time.

“Dude! Why are you being a dick?”

What triggered me to do this? Put short, two things.

For about six weeks now I’ve been expressing to @1simpletrader that for whatever reason his voice matters and people value his opinions. I expressed to him the danger and stupidity/ignorance of coming out “against the grain” about Corona Virus and calling it “just a flu.” I tried to tell him that he is someone who doesn’t have formal education beyond dropping out after a single college semester, is not very good at math, and should not be using his voice to spread ignorance about something this serious without being qualified enough to do such. I attempted to express to him that this will be impactful to both peoples lives and their money. I attempted (on multiple occasions) to express to him reading “another stock book” isn’t as beneficial as a psychological performance book or taking a math/stats class.

I walked him, and everyone else in my chat, through the process step by step item by item and the strain that it will cause on the global supply chain and hospital systems. There are dozens of other items that I’m leaving out here because my goal is not to be an asshole. The point here is he ignored it. He ignored all of it and made a mockery of those who were trying to bring things to light all from the comfort of mom and dads basement.

Too Stubborn

Attempting to explain this to him fell on deaf ears and ultimately it broke beyond the point of diminishing returns for me. And like the prepubescent millennial he is he took the criticism from “friend(s)” as hurt and ghosted. Even after an attempt to “normalize” things and reaching out he disappeared. But that is not the point that broke it with me. What did it for me was seeing him online continuing the same type of moronic behavior that has suppressed his ability to grow as an individual.

Personally, I have a brother that is an ER doctor in NYC. I have been affected by this pandemic on a personal level as many of my closest friends live in New York and my brother is braving things daily and attempting to do his part to help combat it. So when I log in daily and see bullshit like what’s below after attempting to reach out and express concern for why we have a social responsibility to not spread lunacy and after being met with ignorance, arrogance, and disrespect I have no qualms about “letting it rip.”

Cliff Notes:

  1. @1SimpleTrader and I have “known” one another 8 years

  2. Despite living in his parents basement and not having bills he’s not been able to elevate his life the entire time I’ve known him

  3. He’s never had a single profitable month that I know of trading stocks

  4. He draws pretty lines

  5. He makes shitty decisions

  6. He will bitch, complain, and blame everything and everyone else but himself when the shitty decision he makes doesn’t pan out

  7. He makes fun of people who are trying to better their lives/selves

  8. He calls people “Furus” while throwing out “fact based commentary” on the markets without ever having been profitable for a single month of the longest bull run ever

  9. He still lives in mom’s basement at the age of 30 (literal fact)

  10. He still works at a grocery store with his mother (again, literal fact)

  11. He is still doing his part to help you destroy your bank account by using his social media “authority” to spread “trading ideas” that are unsustainable as evidenced by his lack of success

  12. He can only afford to put on “lotto size” (~$200 max) positions and all “trades” he lists should be assumed as such

  13. He is still making ignorant comments about the Virus

  14. He has never (to my knowledge) taken public accountability for making dangerously moronic comments

  15. He has read more trading books than anyone I’ve encountered without being able to apply any results to his own trading

  16. He has no more “authority” on the subject of TRADING PROFITABLY than a bag of Doritos (opinion) or Eric Trump (Fact)

  17. When one of his “trades” does not work he will tell you “It’s just a lotto” or “It’s okay to be wrong”

  18. When shit hits the fan he will attempt to undermine the source (likely how he’ll handle this) and deflect with “humor”

  19. When undermining and deflecting will not work he will ghost

  20. There are worse/repugnant things that I/we know about him that I have withheld…for now…

Lonzo

Lonzo

The Good:

Lonzo's Fast Break court vision is elite. Yes, it totally is. No one sensible would dispute this. See example below. 

 

Point to Consider:

On average only 19% of all possessions in the NBA are fast break possessions. The best team in the NBA at fast breaks is the warriors and they average 22.3 points per game in the fast break. The lakers are in the top 10 with 15.2 points per game. Even if you would suggest that they double from where they are that puts them at 30 points per game. 


Hypothesis:

Lonzo Ball's unorthodox shot will not translate to the NBA as efficiently as it did in college. He will get a lot of fan fare for his fast break passing and for the hype, but the inefficiencies will stand out as the game slows down and he ultimately will not be a top guard in the NBA and will not be the best PG in his draft class. (DSJ was my suggestion at time of draft) 

Proposed Reason:

Average NBA player is 6'7" making it more difficult for Lonzo to get his shot off as compared to in college with the average height being 6'3". Lonzo's inability to shoot anything other than layups and open 3's will limit some of his versatility in college. 

Result Thus Far: 

Lonzo is not good at shooting the ball thus far, especially from 3 where he shoots in the bottom tier. (League Average is ~2x better what he shoots). He averages 9Ast/game but also average 4.5Turnovers a game. 


Argument: 

Lonzo wasn't drafted to be a shooter and his ability to pass the ball will add pressure on defenses which will create space and make up the difference between his ineffective shooting. 

Rebuttal: 

Lonzo is averaging close to 9 assists a game which is good.  His assist to turnover ratio however is only 2/1. His turnover rate thus far is that of players like Justice Winslow, Patrick Patterson, and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist. No where near the 2.8 Rondo averages or the 3.8 guys like Chris Paul Average.

There are elite guards that average 2-2.5 AST/TO a game but these guards are scoring guards (Lillard, Kyrie, Harden), not the pass first guards like Rondo and Paul.

This suggests that yes he can pass the ball, but as the game shrinks and he gets into the half court he is mistake prone.

Going deeper into his turnover rate, Lonzo in college averaged 18% turnover rate (18% of all possessions resulted in a turnover) this number is currently sitting at 23%. Close to 1/4 touches results in a turnover. 

Assist to Turnover Ratios @ 2/1

Assist to Turnover Ratios @ 2/1


Argument: 

Lonzo was a good shooter in College and was able to get his shot off therefore he will be a good shooter in the pros. 

Rebuttal:

He is averaging < 20% from 3. Put into perspective, thats worse than Andre Roberson.


Argument: 

Plenty of NBA point guards don't have a mid range or floater game and do just fine only shooting layups and 3's. (James Harden for example)

Rebuttal: 

Harden shoots a very efficient percentage almost anywhere on the floor. He shoots league average from three. He also shoots very efficiently with a high # of his shots taken up to 14ft away from the basket. Harden gets to the free throw line more than most players in the league offsetting any shooting inefficiencies.

Lonzo would need to double his 3pt shooting % just to become league average from 3.

Oh, also, James Harden's shot plot is consistent from everywhere all over the floor. He's not limited to certain places on the floor.

Harden Shot Chart

Shoots very consistently no matter where he is.


Lonzo's Shot Chart:

In college, Lonzo was able to step beyond the line and shoot beyond the defense. This allowed his shots to be less contested by the defenders. In the NBA he's not been able to replicate that shooting an abysmal 18.6% from 3. Since no shot chart exists for his totals in the NBA thus far, Ill use his college chart to illustrate the point I want to make (even though it is astronomically better than his SL chart). 

Lonzo virtually didn't take shots that weren't at the rim or from 3.

Unlike Harden (above) who was consistent in both attempts and makes across the board up to 14ft and beyond the arc, Ball definitely has tendencies that show he has favoritism's. If it's not a layup/dunk or a 3 he aint taking it. Furthermore, he shy's away from contact averaging only 3FT per 40mins in college. In Summer League play, Ball didn't shoot a free throw 3 games into the season. 

Below you will see a side by side comparison of Lonzo vs Every Other PG/Combo guard in the league which will show that you need to have more of an arsenal in your game beyond shooting 3's and layups unless you're elite from 3.


Below is a side by side comparison between Lonzo and many of PG/Combo Guards in the NBA. 

Lonzo Ball Shot Chart.

It is important to note that Lonzo's 3pt shooting thus far is ~18.5%. His shot distribution and %ages thus far put him in a category with the likes of Kris Dunn and Elfrid Payton (he shoots worse than both). Even Rajon Rondo's shot distribution shows consistency taking and making from straight away inside the 3 point line outside of 16 feet. The point here is not to suggest that he will be worse than those guys, it is to suggest that his shooting is not merely mediocre or "needs improvement" it has been horrendous.

Mixed Bag:

Lonzo definitely shows flashes of brilliance in his game. He also shows that the skillset for what people want him to be and his vision are actually there.

However, Lonzo's inability to shoot coupled with his high turnover rate is offsetting some the flashes of brilliance that are on display in the video above. Obviously the turnovers will likely come down (that typically comes with more reps/age) but the very terrible shooting is leaving a glaring hole in his game. There is literally no player in the league that has sustained poor shooting and a lack of offensive versatility all the while remaining an effective player.

The above coupled with his turnovers can only yield the following conclusion; the jury is still out on Lonzo. There has been nothing consistently displayed to merit that he will be a perennial all star, or even the top of his class. The hype is there, and sometimes the passing, but the holes are just as big.

If you are able to find me a player that succeeded while shooting this poorly from 3, with a lack of any offensive scoring versatility, along with this high a turnover rate I will keep my mouth shut.

The jury is still out, and until the above is resolved will remain out. No one game sample (good or bad) will determine this one way or the other. 

Final Thought and the Future:

I understand that a lot of the hype surrounding a guy like Lonzo comes from the fact that he’s a hometown kid and the Lakers’ organization, their behemoth hype machine, and delusional fan base are excited to rise back to the top. I would like to submit to them some exercised caution however and warn not to let emotions get in the middle of reality. I believe that the hype behind Lonzo is warranted towards another player not nearly getting half the hype that Lonzo is. Were it me, I would have attempted to position myself to get this next coming of Lebron. I want to leave you with the name Luka Doncic. It is my opinion that he will be what everyone wants Lonzo Ball to be.

Remember the name — Luka.